Polaris rmk 900 specs4/3/2023 ![]() The overlay of the two is similar, but the 755 is a bit stronger down low and through the midrange. With the SLP pipe and ignition reprogramming (at any Polaris dealer) it was 20 pounds lighter, pulled 146.2 HP at 7600 rpm and over 100 foot-pounds from 7200 to over 7600 rpm. It pulled 138.5 HP at 7500 rpm with 99 foot-pounds of torque at 7200 rpm. We ran dyno graphs of both the 900 and 755 in the Oct/Nov 2005 issue of SnowTech. I’ve seen stats on the 900 and it is really peaky, all the HP & torque are on top with very weak bottom end and mid range compared to Cat 900. ![]() But, if this was such a great set-up, why did Polaris abandon the 755cc engine after just one year? Do you have any dyno statistics (HP & torque) for the 2006 Polaris 700 (755cc). ![]() Add C&A Pro skis, SLP can and air filter and weight is within a cheeseburger of the Renegade. The 2006 Polaris RMK 700 (755cc) 144 x 2 looks like a great off-trail set-up. First of all, thanks for a great magazine! You are the only sled mag I trust for honest, real world information. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply.AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |